Kiser v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-00518-JDP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190327991
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from March 22, 2019 to April 22, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has been on intermittent sick leave with the flu/pneumonia for the past couple weeks. In
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from March 22, 2019 to April 22, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has been on intermittent sick leave with the flu/pneumonia for the past couple weeks. In ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended from March 22, 2019 to April 22, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has been on intermittent sick leave with the flu/pneumonia for the past couple weeks. In addition, Counsel also has over 80+ active social security matters, which require two or more dispositive motions per week until mid-April. Due to heavy caseload and unexpected leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
