Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THOMAS v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, 2:15-cv-01952 TLN-EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170329a64 Visitors: 22
Filed: Mar. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 99 CENTS ONLY STORES LLC AND SERG KEREZ TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Earl Thomas ("Plaintiff") is represented by the Law Offices of Paul L. Rein and The Law Offices of Anthony E. Goldsmith. Defendants 99 Cents Only Stores LLC and Serg Kerez ("Non-Government Defendants") are represented by Andrew S. Pauly and Richard G. Stoll of Shoreline, A Law Corporation. Non-Government Defenda
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS 99 CENTS ONLY STORES LLC AND SERG KEREZ TO ANSWER THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Earl Thomas ("Plaintiff") is represented by the Law Offices of Paul L. Rein and The Law Offices of Anthony E. Goldsmith. Defendants 99 Cents Only Stores LLC and Serg Kerez ("Non-Government Defendants") are represented by Andrew S. Pauly and Richard G. Stoll of Shoreline, A Law Corporation.

Non-Government Defendants have recently been served with the First Amended Complaint. Through their counsel, Non-Government Defendants have met and conferred with Plaintiff's counsel. Good cause exists to extend the date for Non-Government Defendants to file and serve their answers to the First Amended Complaint.

The parties have agreed to extend the date for Non-Government Defendants to file and serve their answers to April 17, 2017.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and agreed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Non-Government Defendants shall file their answers to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint on or before April 17, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer