Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. MUNOZ, 1:15-CR-00288-LJO-SKO. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170914878 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING; ORDER. LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Defendant RAMIRO MUNOZ, by and through his counsel of record, ROGER D. WILSON, and Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record PHILLIP A. TALBERT, United States Attorney and KATHLEEN A. SERVATIUS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, hereby stipulates to the following modification of conditions of release: 1. By previous order, on November 14, 2016, MR. MUNOZ was ordered released to the Teen
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING; ORDER.

Defendant RAMIRO MUNOZ, by and through his counsel of record, ROGER D. WILSON, and Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record PHILLIP A. TALBERT, United States Attorney and KATHLEEN A. SERVATIUS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, hereby stipulates to the following modification of conditions of release:

1. By previous order, on November 14, 2016, MR. MUNOZ was ordered released to the Teen Challenge Program, a one-year in-patient drug rehabilitation program maintained by Teen Challenge, located at 42675 Road 44, Reedley, California 93654, under the strict conditions imposed by the United States Pretrial Services Office.

2. MR. MUNOZ, a self-admitted drug addict, has benefited greatly from the residential chemical dependency program administered by Teen Challenge International located in Reedley, California.

3. MR. MUNOZ is now entering his eighth month of clean and sober living and participation in the Teen Challenge program and would like to complete the initial one-year program.

4. Therefore it is stipulated that MR. MUNOZ'S original sentencing date of October 23, 2017, be continued until January 22, 2018 to allow MR. MUNOZ to complete the Teen Challenge program at the Teen Challenge facility in Reedley, California.

5. All other terms and conditions of release remain in full force and effect.

6. Pretrial Services officer has been advised and approves this modification.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED that the above Stipulation Modifying Conditions of Release is hereby approved and the modification set forth in paragraph Four (4) of the Stipulation is adopted as a finding by the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer