U.S. v. Woodfork, 2:10-CR-00347-MCE. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140625b30
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Jill Thomas, Attorney Olaf Hedberg on behalf of Leonard Woodfork, that the status conference scheduled for June 20, 2014 be continued to July 31, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. The government has provided a written Plea Agreement proposing resolution of this matter. Defendant has responded with a pr
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Jill Thomas, Attorney Olaf Hedberg on behalf of Leonard Woodfork, that the status conference scheduled for June 20, 2014 be continued to July 31, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. The government has provided a written Plea Agreement proposing resolution of this matter. Defendant has responded with a pro..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Jill Thomas, Attorney Olaf Hedberg on behalf of Leonard Woodfork, that the status conference scheduled for June 20, 2014 be continued to July 31, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
The government has provided a written Plea Agreement proposing resolution of this matter. Defendant has responded with a proposed alternative resolution. The parties anticipate continued negotiations regarding the resolution of this case.
This case stems from a wiretap investigation and the discovery is voluminous. The parties are reviewing that discovery in light of the proposed and prospective resolution proposals. One of the purposes of this review is to determine whether any disputes as to estimated guideline calculations can be resolved. This process includes the sharing of some defense investigation information with the government. Both sides of the case are also conducting further follow up investigation. This investigation impacts the potential sentencing guidelines applicable to Defendant Leonard Woodfork. Lastly, the interaction of the instant matter with a previous parallel matter in Placer County has presented some unique issues that the parties are in the process of resolving.
JILL THOMAS
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. A status conference in this matter is set for June 20, at 9:00 AM;
2. Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (reasonable time to prepare) up to and including July 31, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
