Filed: Feb. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order dated October 12, 2010 (Docket #43), the parties set page limits on Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "SAC") and related briefs; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that given the complexity of the issues to be add
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order dated October 12, 2010 (Docket #43), the parties set page limits on Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "SAC") and related briefs; WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that given the complexity of the issues to be addr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order dated October 12, 2010 (Docket #43), the parties set page limits on Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "SAC") and related briefs;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that given the complexity of the issues to be addressed in Defendants' reply in support of the motion to dismiss the SAC, an expanded page limit is warranted;
THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate that Defendants will file a single reply brief that shall not exceed 25 pages.
The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order approving this Stipulation.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Charlene S. Shimada, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 25th day of January, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
Bingham McCutchen LLP
By: Charlene S. Shimada
Attorneys for Defendants Hansen
Medical, Inc., Fredrick H. Moll,
Steven M. Van Dick and Gary C.
Restani
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on January 25, 2011, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants on record.
By: Diane R. Imai