Lammey v. Starbucks Corporation, 2:18-cv-09477-RGK-JC. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190711813
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58(D)). R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On June 27, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 12(c)") and dismissing the Complaint in its entirely, with prejudice. [Docket No. 33.] Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58(D)). R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . On June 27, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 12(c)") and dismissing the Complaint in its entirely, with prejudice. [Docket No. 33.] Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED i..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58(D)).
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
On June 27, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting Defendant Starbucks Corporation's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Rule 12(c)") and dismissing the Complaint in its entirely, with prejudice. [Docket No. 33.]
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety;
2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant Starbucks Corporation; and
3. Plaintiff Dwain Lammey will take nothing by way of the Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a judgment for dismissal pursuant to Rule 58(d) consistent with this Order.
Source: Leagle
