Ambrosio v. Cogent Communications, Inc., 14-cv-02182-RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160531d07
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEFING RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Recognizing the decision in Lewis v. Epic Systems Corporation, No. 15-2997, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9638 (7th Cir. May 26, 2016), is not binding on this Court, the parties are directed to file a supplemental brief of not more than ten (10) pages addressing the rationale and application of the decision to the motion to compel arbitration currently under submission. These briefs should be filed on or before June 10, 201
Summary: ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEFING RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Recognizing the decision in Lewis v. Epic Systems Corporation, No. 15-2997, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9638 (7th Cir. May 26, 2016), is not binding on this Court, the parties are directed to file a supplemental brief of not more than ten (10) pages addressing the rationale and application of the decision to the motion to compel arbitration currently under submission. These briefs should be filed on or before June 10, 2016..
More
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEFING
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Recognizing the decision in Lewis v. Epic Systems Corporation, No. 15-2997, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9638 (7th Cir. May 26, 2016), is not binding on this Court, the parties are directed to file a supplemental brief of not more than ten (10) pages addressing the rationale and application of the decision to the motion to compel arbitration currently under submission. These briefs should be filed on or before June 10, 2016, and no reply briefs will be permitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
