Filed: Sep. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Sept. 30, 2009 No. 08-16377 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-20194-CR-SH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIZA A. LAMELA, a.k.a. Maritza, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 30, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Sept. 30, 2009 No. 08-16377 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-20194-CR-SH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIZA A. LAMELA, a.k.a. Maritza, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 30, 2009) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Sept. 30, 2009
No. 08-16377 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-20194-CR-SH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIZA A. LAMELA,
a.k.a. Maritza,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 30, 2009)
Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Monique Brochu, appointed counsel for Mariza Lamela in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lamela’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2