Craig v. County of El Dorado, 2:18-cv-2612 JAM KJN P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190621937
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 17, 2019, petitioner filed a letter explaining why his opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed late. Good cause appearing, petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, and his opposition is deemed timely-filed. Respondent is granted seven days from the date of this order in which to file a reply. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, to oppose respond
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 17, 2019, petitioner filed a letter explaining why his opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed late. Good cause appearing, petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, and his opposition is deemed timely-filed. Respondent is granted seven days from the date of this order in which to file a reply. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, to oppose responde..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On June 17, 2019, petitioner filed a letter explaining why his opposition to the motion to dismiss was filed late. Good cause appearing, petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, and his opposition is deemed timely-filed. Respondent is granted seven days from the date of this order in which to file a reply. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner is granted an extension of time, nunc pro tunc, to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss;
2. Petitioner's opposition (ECF No. 35) is deemed timely-filed; and
3. Respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days from the date of this order.
Source: Leagle
