Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation, 16-cv-00724-DMR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180827767
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On August 17, 2018, Defendant Starbucks Corporation filed a letter in which it alleges that Plaintiff may have improperly withheld evidence in this case and may lack standing to bring his claims in this action. [Docket No. 123.] On August 20, 2018, the court ordered Plaintiff Scott Johnson to file a response to the letter by no later than August 23, 2018. [Docket No. 124.] No such response has been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by Aug
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . On August 17, 2018, Defendant Starbucks Corporation filed a letter in which it alleges that Plaintiff may have improperly withheld evidence in this case and may lack standing to bring his claims in this action. [Docket No. 123.] On August 20, 2018, the court ordered Plaintiff Scott Johnson to file a response to the letter by no later than August 23, 2018. [Docket No. 124.] No such response has been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by Augu..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
On August 17, 2018, Defendant Starbucks Corporation filed a letter in which it alleges that Plaintiff may have improperly withheld evidence in this case and may lack standing to bring his claims in this action. [Docket No. 123.] On August 20, 2018, the court ordered Plaintiff Scott Johnson to file a response to the letter by no later than August 23, 2018. [Docket No. 124.] No such response has been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by August 29, 2018, Plaintiff shall submit a statement explaining why he should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the court's August 20, 2018 order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
