Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. LYLE, 1:12-cr-00406 AWI. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20131101713
Filed: Oct. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2013
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE EXAMINATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Homeland Security Investigations agents shall make a duplicate copy of the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) and any other storage media for defense analysis. 2. The duplicate copies of the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) and storage media shall be made available for defense counsel, Brian C. Andritch, Esq., and defendant
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE EXAMINATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Homeland Security Investigations agents shall make a duplicate copy of the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) and any other storage media for defense analysis.

2. The duplicate copies of the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) and storage media shall be made available for defense counsel, Brian C. Andritch, Esq., and defendant's proposed expert, Marcus Lawson, or a colleague at the same employer, Global Compusearch, LLC, to review at Homeland Security Investigations' offices for the purpose of preparing for trial in the above-entitled action. The images on the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) and storage media shall not be viewed by any other person unless defense counsel is present and the viewing is necessary to prepare for defendant's defense.

3. A private room will be provided for the defense examination. No government agents will be permitted inside the room while this examination is taking place.

4. The expert will be permitted to bring whatever equipment, books or records he believes necessary to conduct the examination.

5. Neither the defense expert nor defense attorney shall remove the hard drive(s), cellular phone(s) or other storage media from the HSI offices.

6. With the exception of materials which would be considered child pornography under federal law (including visual images and data capable of conversion into a visual image), the expert may download and remove files or portions of files, provided the forensic integrity of the hard drive is not altered. The expert will certify in writing that he has taken no materials which would be considered child pornography under federal law and that he has not caused any child pornography to be sent off site.

7. Except when a defense expert or attorney fails to provide this certification, no Government official, or any person connected with the Government, will examine or acquire in any fashion any of the items used by the expert in order to conduct the defense analyses. However, should a defense expert fail to certify that the items to be taken off site do not contain child pornography, Government officials may then inspect or examine the materials in order to ensure that prohibited child pornography has not been removed.

8. When the defense indicates that it is finished with its review of the copy of the hard drives, said drives shall be "wiped" clean and promptly returned to defendant's proposed expert who originally provided the drives for the purpose of this examination.

9. Any disputes regarding the above or problems implementing this order shall be brought to the attention of the court through representative counsel after first consulting opposing counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer