Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BELL v. ANDREWS, 2:13-cv-54-DPM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20151119b58 Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER D. P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . Despite the Court's Order, No. 94, Bell didn't appear at the 18 November 2015 hearing. The Court will therefore dismiss Bell's remaining claim against Andrews without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2). The pending motions, No. 92 & 93, are denied as moot. Mr. Rosenzweig is relieved as counsel with the Court's thanks. So Ordered.

ORDER

Despite the Court's Order, No. 94, Bell didn't appear at the 18 November 2015 hearing. The Court will therefore dismiss Bell's remaining claim against Andrews without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LOCAL RULE 5.5(c)(2). The pending motions, No. 92 & 93, are denied as moot. Mr. Rosenzweig is relieved as counsel with the Court's thanks.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer