Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. APPROXIMATELY $70,563.22 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 1:13-CV-00602-JLT. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140724906 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER DATES; ORDER (Doc. 23) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. The United States, Claimant James Park and Potential Claimant Helen Park, by and through their attorney of record, hereby move for a continuance of the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order (ECF No. 22). The parties jointly agree that to facilitate and complete full discovery and disclosure of said discovery, the discovery and di
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER DATES; ORDER (Doc. 23)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

The United States, Claimant James Park and Potential Claimant Helen Park, by and through their attorney of record, hereby move for a continuance of the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order (ECF No. 22).

The parties jointly agree that to facilitate and complete full discovery and disclosure of said discovery, the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the Joint Scheduling Report should be extended approximately 90 days and that the remaining dates in the Court's Scheduling Order issued pursuant thereto should be extended approximately 90 days;

Since the time of the initial scheduling conference, Ellis Park, counsel for Claimant James Park and Potential Claimant Helen Park has undergone invasive surgery to remove part of his lower right lung. Additionally, Counsel has had complications arise from the surgery, has been hospitalized, and is currently under doctors care and unable to meet with his clients in order to prepare discovery responses and clear dates for depositions.

Due to Attorney Park's recent serious health issues, the parties now jointly agree the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the Joint Scheduling Report and the Court's Scheduling Order issued pursuant thereto should be extended approximately sixty (90) days, and the remaining scheduling dates should be extended ninety (90) days;

The parties hereby stipulate and propose that the dates set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order (ECF No. 22) should be changed to the following dates:

Scheduling Order Date Current Date/Deadline Proposed New Date Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff September 30, 2014 December 30, 2014 Expert Disclosure September 2, 2014 December 2, 2014 Supplemental Expert Disclosure No Dates Given N.A. Expert Discovery Cutoff October 30, 2014 January 30, 2015 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing November 26, 2014 February 26, 2015 Dispositive Motion Filing January 26, 2015 April 26, 2015 Pre-Trial Conference Date March 17, 2015 June 17, 2015 Court Trial Date May 26, 2015 August 26, 2015

ORDER

All dates currently set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order (ECF No. 22) shall be rescheduled to those dates stipulated to by the parties, as set forth hereinabove except that the bench trial is set on September 14, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer