Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackson v. State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 1:17-cv-00007-SKO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180205948 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 23) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Based on the "Joint Stipulation of the Parties to Modify the Scheduling Order" (Doc. 23), and good cause appearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), the Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and modifies its April 5, 2017, Scheduling Order (Doc. 19) as follows: 1 Event Current Date New Date Non-Expert Discovery Dead
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

(Doc. 23)

Based on the "Joint Stipulation of the Parties to Modify the Scheduling Order" (Doc. 23), and good cause appearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), the Court hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and modifies its April 5, 2017, Scheduling Order (Doc. 19) as follows:1

Event Current Date New Date Non-Expert Discovery Deadline February 23, 2018 May 31, 2018 (Doc. 19 at 2:24-25) Dispositive Motion Filing May 2, 2018 January 2, 2019 Deadline (Doc. 19 at 4:27-28) Dispositive Motion Hearing June 27, 2018 February 13, 2019 Deadline (Doc. 19 at 4:27-28) Non-Dispositive Motion Filing May 2, 2018 December 19, 2018 Deadline (Doc. 19 at 3:27-28) Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing May 30, 2018 January 16, 2019 Deadline (Doc. 19 at 3:27-28) Expert Disclosure Deadline March 2, 2018 September 27, 2018 (Doc. 19 at 2:26-27) Rebuttal Expert Disclosure March 30, 2018 November 1, 2018 Deadline (Doc. 19 at 2:26-27) Expert Discovery Deadline April 27, 2018 December 14, 2018 (Doc. 19 at 2:24-25) Settlement Conference May 24, 2018 November 13, 2018 (Doc. 19 at 6:9-10.) at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone Pre-Trial Conference August 22, 2018 April 10, 2019 (Doc. 5:19-20.) Trial October 16, 2018 June 4, 2019 (Doc. 19 at 6:2-3.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Several of the dates proposed by the parties have been adjusted to comport with the Court's calendar, to allow the Court adequate time to rule on non-dispositive and dispositive motions, and to permit the parties sufficient time to prepare their pretrial submissions and to prepare for trial.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer