Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mota, CR 13-0093 JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160504a51 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE BY DEFENSE EXPERT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Based upon a stipulation of the parties, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E), the Court ORDERS as follows: The government shall allow the defense expert Peter Barnett to inspect physical evidence in this case; specifically the tires from the Toyota Tacoma that was recovered April 30, 2013 in Lake County, California. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an ATF S
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE BY DEFENSE EXPERT

Based upon a stipulation of the parties, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E), the Court ORDERS as follows:

The government shall allow the defense expert Peter Barnett to inspect physical evidence in this case; specifically the tires from the Toyota Tacoma that was recovered April 30, 2013 in Lake County, California.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an ATF Special Agent or Task Force Officer shall deliver the tires to Mr. Barnett at Forensic Analytical Sciences, Inc. located at 3777 Depot Road Suite 403 Hayward, CA 94545-2761 on a date agreed upon by all parties.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon delivery of the exhibits identified above to the defense expert, that an ATF Agent or Task Force Officer shall be present when the defense expert conducts his inspection of the tires. Upon the completion of the examination, the defense expert shall forthwith return the remaining above-listed exhibits to the ATF agent or Task Force Officer in attendance;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that potential government expert William Woodruff be permitted to attend the examination;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(b)(1)(B), that the defendant shall promptly provide the government with a copy of the results or report of the physical examinations and scientific tests or experiments which resulted from the analysis conducted under this Order in the event that the defendant intends to use the results or report in the defendant's case-in chief at trial or in sentencing; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Barnet is to safeguard the evidence received, preserving the chain of custody in a manner to faithfully protect the integrity of each exhibit received.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DATED: /s/ __________________________________ RICHARD MAZER Standby Counsel for Jonathan Mota
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer