MacDonald v. King, 4:18-cv-04024. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180904728
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff's motion is premature. Two named defendants have not yet been served and there has been no Initial Scheduling Order entered by the Court setting forth the time for discovery and other deadlines. Plaintiff may submit a motion for summary judgment after an Initial Scheduling Order is entered and the deadline to conduct discovery set forth therein has passed. Accord
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff's motion is premature. Two named defendants have not yet been served and there has been no Initial Scheduling Order entered by the Court setting forth the time for discovery and other deadlines. Plaintiff may submit a motion for summary judgment after an Initial Scheduling Order is entered and the deadline to conduct discovery set forth therein has passed. Accordi..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff's motion is premature. Two named defendants have not yet been served and there has been no Initial Scheduling Order entered by the Court setting forth the time for discovery and other deadlines. Plaintiff may submit a motion for summary judgment after an Initial Scheduling Order is entered and the deadline to conduct discovery set forth therein has passed.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 51) is DENIED. Defendants are not required to respond to this pleading.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
