ORDER

MICHAEL T. LIBURDI, District Judge.

"Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge's first duty in every case." Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 (7th Cir. 2003). In this case, the complaint fails to sufficiently plead jurisdiction.

First, the civil cover sheet, which was signed by an attorney whose signature is not legible, claims the basis of jurisdiction is that the "U.S. Government" is the Plaintiff. (Doc. 1-1 at 1). The Court sees no evidence that this representation is true.

Second, the complaint itself states that the basis for jurisdiction is diversity. (Doc. 1 at 2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332)). However, the complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to establish diversity jurisdiction. For example, the complaint notes that both Plaintiffs are limited partnerships. However, the complaint fails to allege the citizenship of every general and every limited partner. See Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990) (a limited partnership takes on the citizenship of all general and all limited partners). Instead, the complaint alleges, for example, that the general partner of SPUS8 Dakota LP is a limited liability company; but the complaint fails to allege the citizenship of all members of the limited liability company. See Johnson v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, L.P., 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006) (a limited liability company takes on the citizenship of each of its members); see also Celestial Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. City of Philadelphia, 901 F.Supp.2d 566, 581 (E.D. Pa. 2012) ("To establish the citizenship of a limited liability company (LLC), a party must plead the citizenship of each partner or member of the LLC. See Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Wood, 592 F.3d 412, 419-420 (3d Cir. 2010). This must be `traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be' to determine the citizenship of the LLC. Id. (internal quotation omitted)"). Accordingly, the complaint fails to allege the citizenship of the general partner.

Next, the complaint alleges that SPUS8 Dakota LP's limited partner1 is a limited partnership; but the complaint fails to allege the citizenship of the general partner or the limited partner(s) of this limited partnership. See Carden, 494 U.S. at 195-96. Accordingly, the complaint fails to allege the citizenship of the limited partner.

These same pleading deficiencies exist for Plaintiff SPUS8 Pinnacle LLC and Defendant KNR Contractors LLC. This deficiency may also exist as to Defendant Oddonetto Granite & Marble LLC because the complaint pleads the "residen[cy] and domicile" of a member of the LLC but does not specify whether that is the only member of the LLC. See Kanter v. Warner-Lambert, 265 F.3d 853, 857-858 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that being a resident of a state does not establish citizenship).

Thus, based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs have not pleaded sufficient information for this Court to independently examine and determine whether it has subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that by November 29, 2019, Plaintiffs shall file a supplement to the complaint adequately alleging the citizenship of all parties to this case or this case will be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs must also, by this deadline, amend the civil cover sheet if it is inaccurate.