Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for a trial by jury from December 12-13 and on December 16, 2019, with Chief United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. The jury was selected on December 3, 2019. The jury was sworn in on December 12, 2019 and trial commenced. Plaintiff presented its case-in-chief and rested on December 13, 2019. Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law (3 motions), which were denied (2) and granted (1), as set
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , District Judge . This matter came before the Court for a trial by jury from December 12-13 and on December 16, 2019, with Chief United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. The jury was selected on December 3, 2019. The jury was sworn in on December 12, 2019 and trial commenced. Plaintiff presented its case-in-chief and rested on December 13, 2019. Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law (3 motions), which were denied (2) and granted (1), as set ..
More
ORDER
KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court for a trial by jury from December 12-13 and on December 16, 2019, with Chief United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose presiding. The jury was selected on December 3, 2019. The jury was sworn in on December 12, 2019 and trial commenced. Plaintiff presented its case-in-chief and rested on December 13, 2019. Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law (3 motions), which were denied (2) and granted (1), as set forth on the record. As Defendants had already presented rebuttal throughout Plaintiff's case, Defendants rested on December 13, 2019. Plaintiff moved to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim; the motion was denied. Defendants renewed their motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of Plaintiff's case; the motion was denied. On December 13, 2019, the Court held the final jury charge conference with counsel and the jury was dismissed until December 16, 2019. On December 16, 2019, the parties gave their closing arguments. The Court charged the jury on the applicable law and the jury commenced their deliberations. On December 16, 2019, the jury, having heard the evidence, the arguments of counsel, and having considered the same upon their oaths, returned the verdict, a copy of which is attached hereto, in open court with counsel present.
DONE and ORDERED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
HARBOR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff,
v. CIVIL ACTION: 1:18-00111-KD-N
SOUTHERN LIGHT, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
VERDICT
Plaintiffs Breach of Gontract Claim
1. Did Plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Defendants breached the contract?
Answer Yes ______ No ______
If Yes, proceed to Question #2.
If No, proceed to Question #3.
2. Did Plaintiff prove by a preponderance of the evidence compensatory damages against the Defendants for breach of contract?
Answer Yes ______ No _______
If yes, Answer in Dollars and Cents $ ______________
Southern Liqht's Breach of Gontract Counterclaim
3. Did Defendants prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Plaintiff breached the contract?
Answer Yes _______ No _______
If Yes, proceed to Question #4.
If No, sign and date the verdict form.
4. Did Defendants prove by a preponderance of the evidence compensatory damages against the Plaintiff for breach of contract?
Answer Yes _______ No _______
If yes, Answer in Dollars and Cents $74,385.00
Please sign and date this Verdict Form.
SO SAY WE ALL,
\2\16\19 _________________
DATE FOREPERSON
FILED IN OPEN COURT THIS THE
16th DAY oF DECEMBER 2019.
BY: __________________
DEPUTY CLERK
