Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Silva v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00513-GSA. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180316a37 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until April 13, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting d
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until April 13, 2018. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting due dates. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Defendant's second request for an extension of time is granted. Defendant shall file her Opposition no later than April 13, 2018. Any Reply is due within fifteen days after the filing of the Opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer