Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miller v. Adonis, 1:12-cv-00353 DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180209949 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS EDDINGS AND WALKER WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Charles A. Miller and Defendants Eddings and Walker, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice as against Defendants Eddings and Walker only. Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney's fees,
More

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS EDDINGS AND WALKER WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Charles A. Miller and Defendants Eddings and Walker, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice as against Defendants Eddings and Walker only.

Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney's fees, or expenses.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based upon the parties' stipulation (ECF No. 92), Defendants Eddings and Walker have been dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed terminate Defendants Eddings and Walker on the docket sheet. Plaintiff's case now proceeds against Defendants Chudy, Medina and Frederichs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer