Douglas v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01061-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180503e02
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: May 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because a very heavy workload, as well as an upcoming extended vacation to Taiwan from May 2 through M
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because a very heavy workload, as well as an upcoming extended vacation to Taiwan from May 2 through Ma..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because a very heavy workload, as well as an upcoming extended vacation to Taiwan from May 2 through May 19, 2018.
The new due date for Defendant's responsive brief will be Friday, June 15, 2018.
ORDER
Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, Defendant's time to file a responsive brief is extended by 30 days, to June 15, 2018, with all other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order extended accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
