Filed: Jun. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Intervenor. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S ("Asetek"), Defendant CMI USA, Inc. ("CMI") and Intervenor Cooler Master Co., Ltd. ("Cooler Master") jointly stipulate with the Court's permission, to modify the Case Schedule (Dkt. 384), as provided below. Previously, the parties proposed (Dkt. 381) and the Court adopted (Dkt. 384) a case schedule regarding issues remanded by the
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE; SUPPORTING DECLARATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER Intervenor. JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S ("Asetek"), Defendant CMI USA, Inc. ("CMI") and Intervenor Cooler Master Co., Ltd. ("Cooler Master") jointly stipulate with the Court's permission, to modify the Case Schedule (Dkt. 384), as provided below. Previously, the parties proposed (Dkt. 381) and the Court adopted (Dkt. 384) a case schedule regarding issues remanded by the F..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE SCHEDULE;
SUPPORTING DECLARATION;
[PROPOSED] ORDER Intervenor.
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S ("Asetek"), Defendant CMI USA, Inc. ("CMI") and Intervenor Cooler Master Co., Ltd. ("Cooler Master") jointly stipulate with the Court's permission, to modify the Case Schedule (Dkt. 384), as provided below. Previously, the parties proposed (Dkt. 381) and the Court adopted (Dkt. 384) a case schedule regarding issues remanded by the Federal Circuit. The parties have been cooperating regarding discovery and seek a three-week extension to complete discovery, including accommodating deposition witness schedules and the Fourth-of-July holidays, as well as to allow the parties to further assess and discuss whether they can reach agreement on modifications to the language of the injunction that will resolve these remaining issues. The three-week extension will not have any impact on the case other than moving the following due dates.
The parties agree to the proposed new deadlines in the following table.
Event Deadline per Dkt. 384 Proposed New Deadline
Discovery cutoff June 23, 2017 July 14, 2017
Motion for injunction
against Cooler Master due July 13, 2017 August 3, 2017
Responses due August 10, 2017 August 31, 2017
Replies due August 24, 2017 September 14, 2017
Motion hearing September 14, 2017 at 2:00 pm Any date after September 14,
2017 that is convenient for the
Court
DECLARATION AND ATTESTATION
I, Lily Lim, hereby declare that the foregoing statements are true and correct. Further, I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from counsel for CMI USA, Inc. and Cooler Master Co., Ltd.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in Palo Alto, California.
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
By: /s/Lily Lim
Lily Lim
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Asetek Danmark A/S
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court adopts the parties' schedule as set forth in the Stipulation above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.