WATSON v. KELLEY, 5:15CV00141 JLH/BD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150820678
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Alonzo Watson's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relating to Watson's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Alonzo Watson's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1) is denied an
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Alonzo Watson's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relating to Watson's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Alonzo Watson's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1) is denied and..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. In addition, the Court has considered Alonzo Watson's objections to the Recommendation and has reviewed de novo those portions of the record relating to Watson's objections. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommendation as its own. Petitioner Alonzo Watson's petition for writ of habeas corpus (docket entry #1) is denied and dismissed, with prejudice.
When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, there is no basis for this court to issue a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
