U.S. v. BECKMAN, 4:13CR00154-001 SWW. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130618984
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2013
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant's pro se motion to terminate probation previously imposed in the Eastern District of Missouri with supervision transferred to the Eastern District of Arkansas on May 23, 2013. The government opposes the early termination of probation due to the underlying crime, defendant's failure to submit restitution payments in August and October 2012 and the substantial balance of restitution remaining at this time. The memo
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant's pro se motion to terminate probation previously imposed in the Eastern District of Missouri with supervision transferred to the Eastern District of Arkansas on May 23, 2013. The government opposes the early termination of probation due to the underlying crime, defendant's failure to submit restitution payments in August and October 2012 and the substantial balance of restitution remaining at this time. The memor..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant's pro se motion to terminate probation previously imposed in the Eastern District of Missouri with supervision transferred to the Eastern District of Arkansas on May 23, 2013. The government opposes the early termination of probation due to the underlying crime, defendant's failure to submit restitution payments in August and October 2012 and the substantial balance of restitution remaining at this time. The memorandum prepared by the probation officer states that based on the criteria used by the U. S. Probation Office to assess individuals requesting early termination, the defendant is not eligible at this time due to moderate severity violations resulting from recurring noncompliance with respect to court ordered restitution. The Court has considered the defendant's motion and the government's response and finds that defendant's motion for early termination should be denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's motion to terminate probation [doc #3] be, and it is hereby, DENIED.
Source: Leagle
