Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McMillan v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, 1:15-cv-00695-DAD-SMS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160531c18 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GRO-WELL BRANDS, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT SANDRA M. SNYDER , Magistrate Judge . This is a putative class action. Before the Court is Defendant Gro-Well Brands, Inc.'s May 25, 2016 ex parte application for additional time to respond to the amended complaint ("Application"). Doc. 65. Plaintiff filed a Response to the Application on May 26, 2016. Doc. 66. Upon consideration of Defendant's Application and Plaintiff's
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GRO-WELL BRANDS, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

This is a putative class action. Before the Court is Defendant Gro-Well Brands, Inc.'s May 25, 2016 ex parte application for additional time to respond to the amended complaint ("Application"). Doc. 65. Plaintiff filed a Response to the Application on May 26, 2016. Doc. 66.

Upon consideration of Defendant's Application and Plaintiff's Response, the Court finds good cause supporting Defendant's request. Further, the Court denies Plaintiff's request to include in this order language set forth in the Response or any language indicating that the extension should not be construed as a basis for delaying discovery.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Gro-Well Brands, Inc.'s ex parte application for additional time. The time by which Gro-Well Brands, Inc. has to file an answer to the amended complaint is extended to June 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer