Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bridges v. Saul, CV 18-10538-JPR. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191122905 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JEAN ROSENBLUTH , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is ADJUDGED that (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision and awarding benefits or remanding the case for further proceedings is DENIED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is GRANTED; and (3) judgment be entered in the Commissioner's favor.

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Decision and Order, it is ADJUDGED that (1) Plaintiff's request for an order reversing the Commissioner's decision and awarding benefits or remanding the case for further proceedings is DENIED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is GRANTED; and (3) judgment be entered in the Commissioner's favor.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer