Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CHARTAEV, 2:11-CR-0514 TLN. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130529c11 Visitors: 24
Filed: May 24, 2013
Latest Update: May 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONINUATION OF RESTITUTION HEARING FOR ROMAN MALAKHOV; FINDINGS AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Roman Malakhov, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on May 3, 2013 before Judge Burrell. By previous order, the restitution hearing was continued until May 30, 2013 befo
More

STIPULATION REGARDING CONINUATION OF RESTITUTION HEARING FOR ROMAN MALAKHOV; FINDINGS AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Roman Malakhov, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on May 3, 2013 before Judge Burrell. By previous order, the restitution hearing was continued until May 30, 2013 before this Court.

2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue the restitution hearing until July 11, 2013.

3. The government has sought information concerning the loss attributable to the entities that are believed to be the defendant's victims. The government has yet to receive that complete information from the victims. The government has shared the information that it has received with defendant's counsel who has questions about the material. The government needs additional time for the victims to provide additional information.

4. Counsel for the defendant is currently in a murder trial and needs additional time to review the material provided by the government.

5. According to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5), the Court should set a hearing for a final determination of a victim's losses, not to exceed 90 days after sentencing. The date July 11, 2013, is beyond that 90-day window as defendant Malakhov was sentenced on March 8, 2013. The defendant waives all rights that he has to having the restitution hearing scheduled within 90-days of sentencing and requests that the restitution hearing be scheduled for July 11, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that defendant Roman Malakhov has waived his right to have a restitution hearing within 90 days of his sentencing and the restitution hearing for Roman Malakhov presently set for May 30, 2013, is continued to July 11, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer