Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Raymond v. Shue, 2:18-CV-02109. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20181011878 Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 21) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Plaintiff has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion (Doc. 10) to dismiss. The Court has conducted de novo review of the report and recommendation pursuant to Plaintiff's objections. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magis
More

ORDER

The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 21) from United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford. Plaintiff has filed objections. The Magistrate recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion (Doc. 10) to dismiss. The Court has conducted de novo review of the report and recommendation pursuant to Plaintiff's objections. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Magistrate's findings. The report and recommendation is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer