STOWELL v. LONG, 5:12-CV-5125. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141127450
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc.62) filed in this case on November 7, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, f
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc.62) filed in this case on November 7, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, fo..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc.62) filed in this case on November 7, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 59) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
