Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Robert Beltz, 08-16817 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-16817 Visitors: 38
Filed: Oct. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Oct. 13, 2009 No. 08-16817 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00296-CR-J-34-JRK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT BELTZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 13, 2009) Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Louis R.
More
                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                     FILED
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                Oct. 13, 2009
                               No. 08-16817                   THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                  CLERK
                         ________________________

                   D. C. Docket No. 07-00296-CR-J-34-JRK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

ROBERT BELTZ,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Middle District of Florida
                       _________________________

                               (October 13, 2009)

Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Louis R. Hardin, appointed counsel for Robert Beltz in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Beltz’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer