Robey v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 3:16-cv-07212-EMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180516c77
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [F.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among Plaintiffs Michael Robey, Moe Asgharnia, and James Comb ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation ("Defendant" or "Toyota"), by and through their undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to the class cla
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [F.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among Plaintiffs Michael Robey, Moe Asgharnia, and James Comb ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation ("Defendant" or "Toyota"), by and through their undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to the class clai..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL [F.R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among Plaintiffs Michael Robey, Moe Asgharnia, and James Comb ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation ("Defendant" or "Toyota"), by and through their undersigned counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to the class claims and with prejudice as to plaintiffs' individual claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
General Order 45, Section X Certification
The filing attorney hereby certifies that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each signatory, in accordance with N.D. Cal. Gen. Order 45, Section X(B).
Source: Leagle
