Filed: Jan. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on February 4, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the February 4, 2019 hearing to June 10, 2019. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and reques
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on February 4, 2019. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the February 4, 2019 hearing to June 10, 2019. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on February 4, 2019.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the February 4, 2019 hearing to June 10, 2019.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to consult with his client, review the current documents, conduct investigation and prepare himself and his client for the change of plea hearing.
b) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
c) Defendant is currently on pre-trial release, attending school, and has not had any issues/violations while on pre-trial release.
d) The government does not object to the continuance.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
No further continuances.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
