Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bisterfeld, 1:16-CR-00121-LJO-SKO. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190911a78 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2019
Summary: MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT; ORDER DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Under Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States moves for an order dismissing the indictment in this case. Since the case was indicted in 2016, the government has been unable to locate the defendant, who is believed to be residing in Germany. The government believes that it is unlikely that it will be able to extradite the defendant. As such, the interests of justice, at this time, would best
More

MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT; ORDER

Under Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States moves for an order dismissing the indictment in this case. Since the case was indicted in 2016, the government has been unable to locate the defendant, who is believed to be residing in Germany. The government believes that it is unlikely that it will be able to extradite the defendant. As such, the interests of justice, at this time, would best be served by having the court dismiss the indictment, without prejudice, and recalling the related arrest warrant for the defendant.

Dated: September 9, 2019 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney By: /s/ GRANT B. RABENN Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

Under Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States has moved for an order dismissing the indictment in the above-captioned action against the defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that the indictment is dismissed, without prejudice, and the related arrest warrant is recalled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer