J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mendoza Cervantes, 1:16-cv-00485-DAD-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180208834
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: >AMENDED ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received the settlement conference statement from the plaintiff and has learned that the defendant has failed to respond to the settlement offer made by the plaintiff. Indeed, the defendant, apparently, has had no communication with the attorney for the plaintiff at all related to the settlement conference. Thus, the Court is uncertain whether the defendant intends to appear at the conference. T
Summary: >AMENDED ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received the settlement conference statement from the plaintiff and has learned that the defendant has failed to respond to the settlement offer made by the plaintiff. Indeed, the defendant, apparently, has had no communication with the attorney for the plaintiff at all related to the settlement conference. Thus, the Court is uncertain whether the defendant intends to appear at the conference. Th..
More
>AMENDED ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has received the settlement conference statement from the plaintiff and has learned that the defendant has failed to respond to the settlement offer made by the plaintiff. Indeed, the defendant, apparently, has had no communication with the attorney for the plaintiff at all related to the settlement conference. Thus, the Court is uncertain whether the defendant intends to appear at the conference. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:
1. No later than February 14, 2018, the defendant SHALL contact the Court's Clerk at 661-326-6620 and indicate whether he intends to appear at the conference on February 16, 2018;
2. No later than February 14, 2018, the defendant SHALL contact the attorney for the plaintiff and indicate whether he accepts the settlement offer made by the plaintiff. If he does not, he SHALL make a meaningful counteroffer.
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including striking the answer and entering default.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
