Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOLCOMB v. RAMAR, Case No: 13-cv-01102-AWI-SKO. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151008793 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS OFFICER CICCARELLI AND CITY OF MODESTO ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that Defendants Officer Ciccarelli, the City of Modesto and Plaintiff's Second Claim for relief (section 1983 claims against the City of Modesto [ Monell claim]), shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). Each
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS OFFICER CICCARELLI AND CITY OF MODESTO

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that Defendants Officer Ciccarelli, the City of Modesto and Plaintiff's Second Claim for relief (section 1983 claims against the City of Modesto [Monell claim]), shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). Each side shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs related to these dismissed defendants and this dismissed claim.

The filer, Blake P. Loebs, attests that all other signatories listed on whose behalf this filing is submitted concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing. Dated: October 6, 2015.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Defendants Officer Ciccarelli, the City of Modesto and Plaintiff's Second Claim for relief (section 1983 claims against the City of Modesto [Monell claim]) shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each side shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs related to these dismissed defendants and this dismissed claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer