Jercich v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 1:18-cv-00032-LJO-EPG (PC). (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200127903
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF Nos. 55, 56, 57, 59) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Plaintiff, George Sheldon Jercich, is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and recommendations recommending that that the motion
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF Nos. 55, 56, 57, 59) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Plaintiff, George Sheldon Jercich, is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and recommendations recommending that that the motion ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF Nos. 55, 56, 57, 59)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, George Sheldon Jercich, is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and recommendations recommending that that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Smith be granted and that the motion for reconsideration filed by Plaintiff be denied. (ECF No. 59.)
Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed any objections and the time to do so has passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that:
1. The findings and recommendations entered December 23, 2019 (ECF No. 59) are adopted in full;
2. Defendant Smith's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 57) is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint (ECF No. 55) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
5. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
