STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING TIME LIMITS TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on or about May 7, 2013, Plaintiff's counsel, Mr. Galen T. Shimoda, requested Defendants' counsel, Ms. Marcia Ross, Mr. Howard A. Sagaser, and Mr. Michael Baytosh to stipulate to extend the time Plaintiff would have to file an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment, if filed in this matter; and

WHEREAS, on or about May 7, 2013, the parties agreed Plaintiff would have four weeks (28 days) to file an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment, instead of fourteen (14) days as provided by Local Rule 230(c); and

WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2013, the parties agreed that any motion for summary judgment would be filed and served no less than 60 days prior to the scheduled hearing; and

WHEREAS, on or about May 13, 2013, the parties agreed Defendants would have fourteen (14) days to file a reply brief to any opposition to a motion for summary judgment, instead of seven (7) days as provided by Local Rule 230(d);

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows:

By and through their attorneys of record, the parties agree to modify the time limitations provided by Local Rule 230(c) and (d) in that Plaintiff will have twenty eight (28) days to file an opposition brief to a motion for summary judgment; Defendants will have fourteen (14) days to file a reply brief to any opposition to a motion for summary judgment, and any motion for summary judgment will be filed and served on all parties no less than sixty (60) days prior to the scheduled hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.