Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Aldapa v. Fowler Packing Company Inc., 1:15-cv-00420-DAD-SAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190213797 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF Nos. 200, 205) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On September 17, 2018, the Court issued an amended phase two scheduling order setting pretrial deadlines and the trial date for this action. (ECF No. 200.) On February 12, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation to amend the discovery deadlines to accommodate a motion for protective order set for hearing on February 27, 2019, and to allow for discovery pertaining to twenty-five absent clas
More

ORDER RE STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF Nos. 200, 205)

On September 17, 2018, the Court issued an amended phase two scheduling order setting pretrial deadlines and the trial date for this action. (ECF No. 200.) On February 12, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation to amend the discovery deadlines to accommodate a motion for protective order set for hearing on February 27, 2019, and to allow for discovery pertaining to twenty-five absent class members to proceed following the hearing. (ECF No. 205.) The Court finds good cause to grant the modification.

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the September 17, 2018 scheduling order (ECF No. 200) is amended as follows:

1. Non-Expert Discovery Deadline: June 27, 2019; 2. Expert Disclosure Deadline: July 25, 2019; 3. Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadline: October 17, 2019; 4. Expert Discovery Deadline: January 16, 2020; 5. Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: February 20, 2020; 6. Settlement Conference: November 14, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe in Courtroom 8; 7. Pre-Trial Conference: June 29, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.; 8. Trial Date: September 15, 2020 at 1:00 p.m.; 9. All other dates and aspects of the September 17, 2018 amended scheduling order shall remain in effect; and 10. The parties are advised that no further modifications to the scheduling order will be granted absent a showing of good cause. However, the parties are free to contact Courtroom Clerk Mamie Hernandez for an informal discussion with the Court should additional amendments to the scheduling order need to be made.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer