Hamilton v. Sutterfield, 2:13-cv-1143-MCE-DMC-P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181025838
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) seeking reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54). Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erro
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) seeking reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54). Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erron..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) seeking reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54).
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) is therefore AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) is DENIED;
2. The Magistrate Judge's August 10, 2018 order (ECF No. 58) is AFFIRMED; and
3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
