STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Esteban Rodriguez was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) by a complaint filed on February 29, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On May 3, 2016, Defendant Esteban Rodriguez was ordered released pursuant to an order setting conditions of release. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.)
As a condition of release, Defendant was to participate in a drug treatment program and, after completion of the program, to participate in a location monitoring program which required him to have a location monitoring unit installed at his residence and a radio frequency transmitter attached to his person. (ECF No. 10.) The defendant was to remain inside his residence at all times except for "employment; education; religious services; medical, substance abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances; court-ordered obligations; or other activities pre-approved by the PSO." (ECF No. 10 at 2.) As the third party custodian, Elena Torres agreed "(a) to supervise the defendant in accordance with all conditions of release, (b) to use every effort to assure the appearance of the defendant at all scheduled court proceedings, and (c) to notify the court immediately in the event the defendant violates any conditions of release or disappears." (
On January 17, 2017, a pretrial release violation petition was filed which alleged that the defendant had possession of marijuana, a digital scale, and several clear plastic baggies and tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. (ECF No. 22.) Defendant admitted the pretrial services violation at a hearing on January 20, 2017. (ECF No. 23.) A modified order issued setting conditions of release. (ECF No. 26.) Defendant was ordered to remain inside his residence at all times except for "employment; education; religious services; medical, substance abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances; court-ordered obligations; or other activities pre-approved by the PSO." (
On February 21, 2017, a pretrial services violation petition was filed. (ECF No. 27.) The petition stated:
telephone were unsuccessful. (
At the March 2, 2017 hearing, the Court determined that Elena Torres may be in criminal contempt for the breach of her duties to act as third party custodian and the matter was referred to the United States Attorney. Based upon the March 2, 2017 hearing, the Court finds that Elena Torres conduct was irresponsible at best and breached her duties as a third party custodian. Should Elena Torres be considered for a third party custodian in any case in the future or to be a responsible fiduciary, Elena Torres cannot be trusted to fulfill any such duties. Because potential criminal contempt charges could be filed, the court appointed counsel to represent her, advised her of her right to remain silent and advised of potential penalties.