G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. JUAREZ, CIV. S-10-2146 LKK/GGH. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120711872
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. The court is in receipt of a Stipulation of Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 41. In the stipulation, the parties agree to dismiss the case without prejudice, but further stipulate that "provided no party . . . has filed a motion to reopen this action by July 18, 2039, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice." The court will not approve a stipulated dismissal that contemplates a date 27 years in the future for re-opening the case
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. The court is in receipt of a Stipulation of Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 41. In the stipulation, the parties agree to dismiss the case without prejudice, but further stipulate that "provided no party . . . has filed a motion to reopen this action by July 18, 2039, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice." The court will not approve a stipulated dismissal that contemplates a date 27 years in the future for re-opening the case...
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.
The court is in receipt of a Stipulation of Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. 41. In the stipulation, the parties agree to dismiss the case without prejudice, but further stipulate that "provided no party . . . has filed a motion to reopen this action by July 18, 2039, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice."
The court will not approve a stipulated dismissal that contemplates a date 27 years in the future for re-opening the case. Accordingly, the court declines to issue the proposed order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
