TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. VAN DYKE, 2:14-cv-01891-JAM-DAD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150105474
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTIONS AND REMAND; ORDER (Proposed) JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. Come Now Defendants Victor Van Dyke and Terry A. Meistering, by and through their counsel of record, and Plaintiff, Trustmark National Bank, N.A., by and through its counsel of record, Parkinson Phinney and hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The Motions currently set for hearing on November 5, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. are hereby withdrawn with prejudice. 2. The above captioned matter shall be remanded to the S
Summary: STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTIONS AND REMAND; ORDER (Proposed) JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. Come Now Defendants Victor Van Dyke and Terry A. Meistering, by and through their counsel of record, and Plaintiff, Trustmark National Bank, N.A., by and through its counsel of record, Parkinson Phinney and hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The Motions currently set for hearing on November 5, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. are hereby withdrawn with prejudice. 2. The above captioned matter shall be remanded to the Sa..
More
STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTIONS AND REMAND; ORDER (Proposed)
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Come Now Defendants Victor Van Dyke and Terry A. Meistering, by and through their counsel of record, and Plaintiff, Trustmark National Bank, N.A., by and through its counsel of record, Parkinson Phinney and hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The Motions currently set for hearing on November 5, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. are hereby withdrawn with prejudice.
2. The above captioned matter shall be remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court forthwith.
3. Each side to bear their own costs and attorney fees herein.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
