STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

WHEREAS, the parties are currently not in possession of the Total Station Laser Scan performed by and during the San Mateo County District Attorney's investigation of the subject incident;

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants are attempting to secure said Total Station Laser Scan data from the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office and have agreed to produce same to counsel for Plaintiffs if and when received;

WHEREAS, in response to Plaintiffs' request, Defendants have agreed to produce the underlying data obtained from laser scans performed by their designated experts, Ted Kobayashi and Craig Fries;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs contend that the disclosure of this underlying data is necessary for Plaintiffs' experts to accurately examine the evidence for the purpose of reconstruction and rebuttal, if necessary;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs ANNE REBUCAS, et al, and Defendants CITY OF SAN BRUNO, et al, through their counsel of record, in the interests of judicial economy and justice, all would benefit from a continuance of the initial and rebuttal expert report deadlines, which are presently set for January 12, 2017 and February 2, 2017, respectively, (see Document No. 53 at 1:27-8) to March 1, 2017. The parties further agree that the expert discovery cut-off should and will be extended from February 23, 2017 (see Document 53 at 2:1) to March 31, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATE.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the Court hereby modifies its Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (Document No. 53) to extend the deadline for the production of initial and rebuttal expert reports to March 1, 2017 and to extend the expert discovery cut-off to March 31, 2017. The March 9, 2017 motion hearing is vacated.

SO ORDERED.