Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge. On April 30, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed protective order regarding a recording that the United States will produce in discovery. The document does not explain why the parties seek a protective order. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "Protective and Modifying Orders," a "court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relief." Accordingly, the cour
Summary: ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge. On April 30, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed protective order regarding a recording that the United States will produce in discovery. The document does not explain why the parties seek a protective order. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "Protective and Modifying Orders," a "court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relief." Accordingly, the court..
More
ORDER
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On April 30, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed protective order regarding a recording that the United States will produce in discovery. The document does not explain why the parties seek a protective order.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1), "Protective and Modifying Orders," a "court may, for good cause, deny, restrict, or defer discovery or inspection, or grant other appropriate relief." Accordingly, the court will not sign the proposed protective order unless and until the parties demonstrate good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
