Cheban v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-02671-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181029678
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file reply brief is extended to November 2, 2018. This is a first extension of nine days, requested because plaintiff's counsel has three reply briefs due on two successive days. ORDER For good ca
Summary: STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file reply brief is extended to November 2, 2018. This is a first extension of nine days, requested because plaintiff's counsel has three reply briefs due on two successive days. ORDER For good cau..
More
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file reply brief is extended to November 2, 2018.
This is a first extension of nine days, requested because plaintiff's counsel has three reply briefs due on two successive days.
ORDER
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to November 2, 2018. No further extensions will be granted in this matter.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
