Power Analytics Corporation v. Operation Technology, Inc., 8:16-cv-01955-JAK-FFM. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180910547
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. The Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Counts I-VIII of the Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation. 3. This Order and the December 21, 2017 Judgment on the patent claims of the Second Amended Complaint resolve all claims that Plaintiff asserts in this action. Therefore, the
Summary: JUDGMENT JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. The Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Counts I-VIII of the Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation. 3. This Order and the December 21, 2017 Judgment on the patent claims of the Second Amended Complaint resolve all claims that Plaintiff asserts in this action. Therefore, the ..
More
JUDGMENT
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. The Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation is dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.
2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Counts I-VIII of the Third Amended Complaint of Power Analytics Corporation.
3. This Order and the December 21, 2017 Judgment on the patent claims of the Second Amended Complaint resolve all claims that Plaintiff asserts in this action. Therefore, the Clerk is directed to close this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
