Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Sisemore, 14-MJ-70886-MAG. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140708810 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND RULE 5.1 FROM JULY 2, 2014 TO JULY 9, 2014 FOR DEFEDANT FIL FILIMON GUITRON III DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge. STIPULATION Defendant Fil Filimon Guitron III (hereafter, the "Defendant") was charged by criminal complaint in the above-referenced matter on June 26, 2014. The initial detention hearing regarding the Defendant occurred on July 2, 2014. The Defendant was represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Ang
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND RULE 5.1 FROM JULY 2, 2014 TO JULY 9, 2014 FOR DEFEDANT FIL FILIMON GUITRON III

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

STIPULATION

Defendant Fil Filimon Guitron III (hereafter, the "Defendant") was charged by criminal complaint in the above-referenced matter on June 26, 2014. The initial detention hearing regarding the Defendant occurred on July 2, 2014. The Defendant was represented by Assistant Federal Public Defender Angela Hansen, and Assistant United States Attorney Katie Burroughs Medearis appeared on behalf of the Government. At the hearing, the Court set the matter for a further status hearing regarding detention on July 9, 2014 to allow time for an evaluation of whether the Defendant is a viable candidate for a residential drug treatment program. The parties hereby request that time be excluded, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, between July 2, 2014 and July 9, 2014 to allow reasonable time for the effective preparation of counsel, as well as time to allow the parties time to confer and determine whether a pre-indictment resolution is possible. For the reasons stated, the parties believe that good cause exists to exclude and waive time under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(c) and (d), taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of a criminal case and the Defendant's consent.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated by the parties, the Court finds that the aforementioned request is supported by good cause and made with the consent of defendant Fil Filimon Guitron, III. Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 5.1(c) and (d). The Court therefore finds that an exclusion of time between July 2, 104 and July 9, 2014 is merited under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 5.1(c) and (d).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer