Shaw v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-01355-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190304636
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF/RESPONSE TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief/response to motion is extended to March 5, 2019. This is a first extension, of three business days, based on counsel's other work, including briefing and hearings
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF/RESPONSE TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief/response to motion is extended to March 5, 2019. This is a first extension, of three business days, based on counsel's other work, including briefing and hearings...
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF/RESPONSE TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief/response to motion is extended to March 5, 2019.
This is a first extension, of three business days, based on counsel's other work, including briefing and hearings.
ORDER
For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to March 5, 2019.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
