Adlparvar v. County of Alameda, 17-cv-04521-SK. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180130800
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2018
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 33 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Defendants filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within sixty days, with proof of se
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 33 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Defendants filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within sixty days, with proof of ser..
More
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Regarding Docket No. 33
SALLIE KIM, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants filed a notice of settlement in which they advised the Court that the above captioned matter has settled and that, as part of the settlement, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss this action with prejudice. In light of the settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within sixty days, with proof of service, that the agreed consideration for settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar and set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
