Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

The American Beverage Association v. The City and County of San Francisco, 3:15-CV-03415-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160525a38 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND FORGO A HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Standing Order No. 4 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiffs The American Beverage Association, California Retailers Association, and California State Outdoor Advertising Association (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant the City and County of San Francisco, hereby submit to the following stipulated,
More

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND FORGO A HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL

Pursuant to Standing Order No. 4 and Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiffs The American Beverage Association, California Retailers Association, and California State Outdoor Advertising Association (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant the City and County of San Francisco, hereby submit to the following stipulated, expedited schedule for Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal:

Description Proposed Date Deadline for Defendant's Response May 31, 2016 Deadline for Plaintiffs' Reply June 2, 2016 Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Waived Injunction Pending Appeal

This stipulated request to shorten time and forgo a hearing does not affect any other deadlines in the case.

The parties hereby request a Court Order shortening the deadlines described above as stipulated by the parties.

In the event that the Court is disinclined to grant Plaintiffs the relief they request, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court promptly dispose of the instant motion without waiting for a response from the City in order to permit Plaintiffs to file an expedited request for injunction pending appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I obtained in the filing of this document the concurrence from all parties whose electronic signatures appear above.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer